Reply within 1 to 2 working daysNo subscriptionOur own software licences
25 years
of CAD experience at the core of the team
3 layers
of review before every delivery
Large
flexible team that scales with every project
RevitAutoCADInventorRhinoDWG, DXF, RVT, STEP and every common CAD format
For most companies, the decision to outsource technical drafting only comes up once work has already been sitting untouched for a while. The revision round on a set of DWGs slips week after week, the as-built folder keeps growing, and the drafters you do have are tied up in a project that takes priority.
What goes wrong then is rarely spectacular. Details are drawn in later than planned, changes end up in a mailbox instead of in the drawing, and the set that goes to site differs from what has actually been built.
We are OutsourceCAD, and we take over exactly that part. What we do is drafting and modelling, not engineering. The work is done remotely from our own office, on our own licences, to the standard you supply. Our clients are engineering firms, architectural practices, contractors and manufacturers in the Netherlands, and the trigger is almost always the same: too little drafting capacity at the moment it is needed.
Cable tray routing in the model, built with parametric families that carry the material schedule with them.
01
How it works when you outsource technical drafting
It starts with a conversation. In it, we go through what is there, what needs to be finished and in what order. You supply the details and usually also existing drawings that need revising. Barry, our project manager, is the first point of contact for new enquiries, after which Sam, our team leader, takes over the technical side, so there is one fixed line rather than a changing cast of people. Our response time on a new enquiry is 1 to 2 working days. Sufficient information is all we need to start.
A smart component with a live material schedule: a change to one part is reflected in the schedule straight away.
We do not deliver a complete set in one go. We work in stages, send them back, collect feedback and process it before the next part goes out. That rhythm varies by client: on one project we meet every two days and on another weekly, depending on how quickly it needs to be done. Files go back and forth by email. For larger projects, such as greenhouse construction projects, we use software you can log into to follow the project.
Day-to-day contact runs through email, phone and meetings, and when it helps we come to you or welcome your drawing team at our office. If you are considering outsourcing technical drafting, you usually want to see how we work before a large package is handed over. That is fine. A short or small first assignment is enough to judge our speed and accuracy. After that we scale up when the project calls for it, and back down again when the peak is over.
Model in Revit
Built from the documents you supply, consistently to your standard.
Drawings from the model
Floor plans, sections, elevations, details and overviews.
As-built and revisions
Updating existing sets and dossiers that have fallen behind.
Parametric families
Smart components with a material schedule that updates with them.
3D modelling
In Rhino or Inventor, converted to the format your supply chain uses.
Template clean-up
Cleaning up or rebuilding existing families and templates.
Send us your set or model and we will tell you what we can deliver from it.
Three projects under way, and the modelling for the fourth is stalling.
Manufacturers
The product line needs to become smart components, but nobody in-house can be freed up.
Contractors
The as-built dossier needs updating while the drawing office has already moved on to the next job.
Engineering firms
A peak in drafting work that your own team cannot absorb.
Firefly once supplied as-built material in which the existing drawings had been printed incorrectly and partly added to by hand. Poorly legible, messy, and contradictory in a number of places. That kind of package is exactly the work that stays on the shelf in an in-house drawing office, because it is slow and nobody likes to start on it. We worked it out ourselves instead of calling the client about every ambiguity. Where something did not add up, we reconstructed it from what could be derived from the rest of the set, and only asked when there was genuine doubt.
The result was still a clean, usable set. We have now completed more than twenty projects and hundreds of drawings for Firefly. What we take from that above all is how we handle unclear source material: reconstruct first, ask only then, and bundle questions instead of asking them one at a time. There is a second lesson too. For a deadline that could not move, the team worked through evenings and weekends, with days of fourteen to fifteen hours, even during a planned holiday of Sam, the team leader.
That is not a standard rhythm and we do not sell it as one, but it shows what happens when a date is fixed. For anyone weighing up whether to outsource technical drafting, that is often the heart of the question: will the work carry on when things get tense? Our experience is that this question can only really be answered once the first assignment has been delivered.
Our own office with our own licences: nothing needs to be set up or released on your side.
No ongoing payroll costs and no idle staff once the peak is over. If one of our people is off sick or on holiday, we replace them and the work simply carries on.
Outsourcing technical drafting within your own standard
01
Introduction and handover
We go through the work and receive the details and drawing conventions.
02
Reply within 1 to 2 working days
With enough information we can start straight away.
03
Delivery in stages
A first part comes back to you, you review it and we collect your feedback.
04
Check-ins at your pace
Every two days when it is urgent, weekly when things are calmer.
We work to your drawing conventions, not our own. You provide them: the layer structure, file naming, the title blocks used, line weights and the way dimensioning and annotation are set up. If there is no documented standard, we derive it from the set supplied and present our findings before we continue. That takes little time at the start and prevents half a set from having to go back through the layer structure later. We work in our own environment on our own licences, not in yours. That saves you setting up workstations, accounts and access rights. Exchange takes place in DXF, DWG, Revit formats and STEP files, and in practice in any common CAD format. Our core software is Revit, AutoCAD and Rhino, plus Inventor and Grasshopper, and to a limited extent Dynamo and Vault.
We always work with the latest versions, and if you are on an older version we align the exchange format with it before any volume is produced. The whole point of outsourcing technical drafting is that the delivered files slot straight into the existing set. A drawing that is correct in content but sits in a different layer structure still costs your drawing office time to put right. That is why, for us, the standard is not a formality up front but the first thing we pin down. If in doubt, we submit a small part of the set before the rest follows, so the fit has been tested in practice.
Your fixed points of contact
Project manager Barry leads the first conversation, team leader Sam keeps a firm grip on the technical side
You never have to explain the situation all over again. Getting acquainted takes a short fifteen-minute call.
Three review layers on outsourced technical drafting
Every piece of work goes through at least three review layers before it goes back. A drafter produces the work, a second team member checks it, then Sam as team leader reviews it, and Barry checks it last. In practice this keeps the number of errors to a minimum. That set-up was not designed to impress, but because outsourced work carries an extra risk: the checker is not sitting next to the drafter and cannot just look over their shoulder.
Step 1
Drafter
Creates the model and the drawings.
Step 2
Second team member
Checks the work for structure and dimensions.
Step 3
Sam
Team leader: reviews the technical side of the set.
Final check
Barry
Project manager: gives it a final review before delivery.
What the second layer mainly catches are the small things that arise in volume. A revision carried through incorrectly, a symbol used differently on one drawing than on another, a dimension that was not updated after a change.
Case study: Firefly
Sam looks at the technical coherence of the set and at whether the drawing matches what you supplied. The final check is deliberately less technical and more focused on completeness: whether everything is included, whether the numbering is right and whether the correct version has been sent. Everyone who works for us has more than ten years of CAD experience, and the core of the team has around twenty-five years of combined experience.
Sam has more than fifteen years of background in architecture, worked in Iran for seven years, ran his own design firm in the Netherlands and still works as an engineer. We do not promise error-free work, because that does not exist in drafting at this volume. What we do organise is that errors are found before the set lands on your desk.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about outsourcing technical drafting
Anything that is drafting or modelling work, from 2D drawings to 3D models, as-built drawings and revisions. Engineering is not included, because we do not make calculations or give structural advice. The focus is on work with a lot of volume and repetition, because that is where the gain is greatest. Think of a revision round across a large folder of existing DWGs.
Think also of drawing up variants that are very similar in content. Work closely tied to design decisions is usually better kept in-house. In a first conversation we therefore split the package into what goes out and what stays. If you want to know where that line lies in your case, you can request that conversation without obligation.
We start as soon as the information we need is in. We respond to a new enquiry within 1 to 2 working days, followed by a conversation in which we go through the project. What we need are the details, the existing drawings and the drawing conventions that apply. If one of those three is missing, that is usually what delays the start, not our schedule. The team is already in place, so we do not need to recruit anyone or train them in the trade. If it is urgent, we add people to the project straight away. We only commit to a specific delivery date once we know the size of the set. A short introductory meeting is enough to establish what still needs to be supplied.
Then we replace that person and the work carries on. That is one of the reasons clients outsource technical drafting rather than taking on a temporary worker. When an in-house employee drops out, the work stops while payroll costs continue. With us you pay no ongoing payroll costs, and we only bill genuine working hours. If someone steps away for five minutes for a coffee, we stop the clock. Our large, variable team scales up or down per project, depending on what is needed. Because the team knows the project standard, a changeover takes little onboarding time. In the first conversation we discuss what that staffing looks like for a specific project.
Barry, our project manager, is the first point of contact for new enquiries. As soon as the project becomes technical, Sam, our team leader, takes over that side and remains your fixed line of contact. Your project lead therefore does not have to deal with a changing set of drafters. We are in daily contact by email, phone and meetings.
We agree the meeting rhythm in advance: every two days when things need to move fast, and weekly when that is enough. We come to you or welcome you at our office, even though the work itself is done remotely. On larger projects you can log into the software in which the project runs and follow progress yourself. If you would rather get to know us before anything is agreed, you can get in touch through the contact form.
Because a single final check on a large set structurally comes too late. A drafter draws, a second team member checks that work, Sam as team leader reviews it next and Barry checks it last. Each layer catches something different: detail errors, technical coherence and completeness. If an error only became apparent at delivery, it would often affect not one drawing but a whole series. In work with a lot of repetition, a wrong assumption spreads quickly across the set. In practice, this keeps the number of errors to a minimum. It takes time on our side, but it prevents correction rounds on yours. We are happy to explain in a conversation what this set-up means for a specific set.
No, we work in our own environment and on our own licences. You therefore do not need to set up workstations, accounts or access rights. What we do adopt are your drawing conventions, your layer structure and your templates. Files go back and forth by email, and on larger projects through software in which the project can be followed.
We deliver in DXF, DWG, Revit formats and STEP files, and in practice in any common CAD format. Our core software is Revit, AutoCAD and Rhino, supplemented by Inventor, Grasshopper and to a limited extent Dynamo and Vault. We always work with the latest versions and align the exchange format when a set runs on an older version. We prefer to settle that before the first drawing is produced.
For the rate we choose between hourly billing and a fixed project price, and we make that choice together. For work with a clear scope, such as a defined revision round, a fixed project price is the obvious choice. For work that takes shape along the way, an hourly rate is fairer to both sides. We only bill genuine working hours, so no rounded-up blocks and no time that was not spent on the drawing.
Prepaid hours cards and monthly hours subscriptions are not part of how we work. What keeps costs down is a clear brief with complete source data, a documented standard and feedback that comes in rounds. We only prepare an estimate once we have seen the material. For an indication, a conversation with the documents to hand is the fastest route.
You do. Everything we make belongs to you, including the families, templates and models we build. So far we have not signed a non-disclosure agreement, simply because clients have not asked for one. If you insist on one, we will sign it without objection. The same goes for arrangements on how we handle the source material you supply. Beyond that, we show work rather than promises, for example a small first assignment on which speed and accuracy can be judged. That is the route most clients choose when they outsource technical drafting for the first time. We are happy to discuss which part of your set is suitable for that in your specific case.