Anyone looking at CAD drafting costs usually counts only the rate, not what it costs when the drafting work sits untouched. That second amount never appears on an invoice, but in practice it adds up fast. A revision round that waits three weeks holds up the rest of the project.
A set of as-built drawings that nobody finishes still lands on the table at handover, and then in a rush. A drafter who squeezes in the details of another project alongside his own work delivers more slowly and with more corrections.
We see this situation regularly with new requests, and the trigger is almost always capacity: too little time, too few drafters, or a peak the in-house team cannot handle. Below, we explain how our costs are structured, when hourly billing makes more sense than a fixed price, and what keeps the bill down in practice. We do not list amounts, because without the work that goes with them they say very little.
Cable tray routing in the model, built with parametric families that carry the material schedule with them.
You can pay by the hour or per project at a fixed price. We decide together which option fits, and that choice depends mainly on how clearly the job is defined. If there is a well-defined package, such as a complete set of drawings of a known size with established CAD standards, a fixed price works well. You know where you stand and we know what we have to deliver. If the scope is still moving, which is often the case with revision work because it only becomes clear along the way how much really needs changing, an hourly rate is fairer to both sides.
Nobody then has to price in a risk that may not exist. We only bill net working hours. We stop the clock as soon as someone goes to get a coffee for five minutes. That may sound petty, but it is the only way to provide a timesheet a client can actually use. What we do not offer is a prepaid block of hours or a monthly hours subscription. For work that varies from peak to peak, the client would mainly be paying for hours they do not use.
On top of that, you pay no ongoing wage costs with us. When the volume drops, we scale back and the bill drops with it. We do not quote specific rates on this page, because the setup differs per job and a figure without context tells you nothing. In a half-hour conversation, we can give you a well-founded estimate, and for that we mainly need the existing material and the output you want.
The comparison most managers make is with an employee of their own. That comparison works out differently than the hourly rate alone suggests. A permanent drafter costs recruitment, onboarding time, a workstation, licences and ongoing wage costs, even in the months when it is quiet. When they are ill or on holiday, the work stops or shifts to colleagues who are already fully booked. We approach this differently.
Our large, flexible team is already in place, so we deploy what the project needs and scale up or down for each project. For urgent work, we add people straight away. If someone on our side is out due to illness or holiday, we replace them so the work simply carries on; that risk lies with us, not with the client. Everyone who works for us has more than ten years of CAD experience, so there is no time spent learning the trade itself. What there is, is a short adjustment period to the client's standard, and we keep that brief by asking for the drawing conventions in advance.
You also keep one fixed point of contact. Barry, our project manager, picks up the request and Sam, our team leader, takes over the technical side. That combination of flexible capacity and fixed points of contact is exactly where the cost comparison tips, especially at firms whose volume varies from quarter to quarter. We also work in our own environment with our own licences, so you do not have to set up a workstation or arrange access. That, too, saves you time and money that usually stays out of sight in an hourly comparison.
No ongoing payroll costs and no idle staff once the peak is over. If one of our people is off sick or on holiday, we replace them and the work simply carries on.
An estimate is only useful if the project runs predictably, so that is what we steer towards. It starts with a conversation in which we go through the project. The client supplies the details and usually existing drawings that need a revision. We first review that material ourselves and then come back with what we see and what we propose. We then deliver in stages, gather feedback, make adjustments and carry on. This way of working has a direct effect on costs. Errors and misunderstandings come to light after the first batch, not the last, and correcting them at that point costs a fraction. The rhythm of our meetings differs per client: every two days on a tight schedule, weekly when there is more room. Contact runs via email, phone and meetings, and we visit the client or welcome them at our office.
On larger projects, such as greenhouse construction projects, we work with software that the client can log into to follow the project. For standalone AutoCAD drafting work, files go back and forth by email. Before anything leaves our hands, it passes through three review layers: a second team member checks the drafter, Sam then reviews it as team leader and Barry carries out the final check as project manager. That costs us time, but it prevents the expensive alternative, namely an error that only surfaces on site or during fabrication. We work to the drawing conventions we receive from the client, so there is no discussion afterwards about layers, hatching or naming.
Our clients are engineering firms, architectural practices, contractors and manufacturers, and more broadly any company with technical drafting work. The people at the table are managers, team leaders and owners, in other words people who keep an eye on both the schedule and the bill. Their question is almost never whether drafting can be done more cheaply, but whether the work will be finished on time without them having to take on permanent capacity.
At an engineering firm, there is often a peak: a contract has been won and the in-house team is just short of the hours for it. With a contractor, it is regularly about as-built material that is lagging behind construction. With manufacturers, we more often see repetitive work where time can be saved with smart components, as in greenhouse construction, where a valve in 90 and in 110 would otherwise be redrawn by hand every time.
In each of these cases, the cost question lies somewhere else. One client wants to know what a clearly defined set will cost, while another mainly wants the deadline met and accepts that the scope will only become clear along the way. We have also had a deadline that could not move, and our team worked evenings and weekends to deliver on time, with days of fourteen to fifteen hours.
That is not standard, but it shows where our priorities lie. Our focus is on the Netherlands, and the work is carried out entirely remotely from our own office. Clients are welcome to visit and we also come to them, but the drafting itself runs remotely. This service came about last year because a client asked for it, and since then it has been a permanent part of what we offer.
Send us your documents and drawing conventions and we will let you know within one to two working days what we can take on and when.