If you want to hire a structural drafter, you usually do not have a single drawing in mind but a whole stack. Volume is the reason: dozens of details that resemble each other, a series of sections that recurs on every project, a set of connections that comes back in twenty variants.
That repetitive part eats up hours in your own drawing office, while it asks little of the people who truly understand the structure. We take over exactly that part. We draft and model, we do not do engineering, and we keep that boundary sharp.
We deliver 2D drafting and, where needed, 3D modelling, as-built drawings and revisions. Our team works fully remotely from our own office, with our own licences and the latest versions of Revit, AutoCAD and Rhino. When there is a peak, we scale up with our large, variable team, which grows with whatever the work requires on each project. Everyone who works for us has well over ten years of CAD experience. You keep your own people free for the work only they can do.
Cable tray routing in the model, built with parametric families that carry the material schedule with them.
It starts with a conversation. In it we go through what is on the table: the type of project, the size of the set, the documents you can supply and the deadline by which the work needs to be finished. We usually receive existing drawings that need a revision round, supplemented by details, dimensions and the conventions that already apply internally. Barry, our project manager, is the first point of contact for a new enquiry. As soon as the content becomes technical, Sam, our team leader, takes over, so you keep one fixed line of contact instead of a changing help desk.
We start as soon as we have enough information to draft without guesswork. After that we deliver in parts. That choice is deliberate: a first partial set shows early on whether our interpretation matches what your project lead had in mind, and correcting five drawings costs less than correcting fifty. We collect feedback, process it and continue with the next part. We tune the meeting rhythm to the pace of the project.
On a tight schedule we speak every two days, on a calmer project weekly. Files go back and forth by email. For larger projects, such as greenhouse construction projects, we work with software you can log into to follow progress. Day-to-day contact runs by email, phone and meetings, and we can visit you or welcome you at our office. We respond to a new enquiry within 1 to 2 working days, so nobody is left waiting for a first estimate.
For Firefly we received as-built material that was clean in no respect whatsoever. The existing drawings had been printed incorrectly and parts of the set had been added to by hand. Hard to read, messy, and in some places two sheets contradicted each other. The easy route would have been to pick up the phone at every ambiguity. We did not do that. We worked it out ourselves, reconstructed the logic of the set, and only called where a decision by the client was genuinely needed.
We still delivered a clean result. We took two lessons from that project. The first is that a drafter who pushes every ambiguity back to the client moves the problem instead of solving it, whereas a client hires someone precisely to keep working independently. The second is that a messy starting set does not get better by itself when you lay new layers over it. We straighten out a set like that first and only then build on it. We record the assumptions we make along the way, so you can check afterwards what a decision was based on.
We have now completed more than twenty projects and hundreds of drawings for Firefly, largely in this kind of revision and as-built work. That repetition helps us. Our drafters recognise the patterns, know where the errors usually are and do not have to work out afresh each time how to tackle an incomplete source. For you, that means less explanation up front and fewer surprises afterwards, and that is exactly what most heads of drawing offices are looking for.
No ongoing payroll costs and no idle staff once the peak is over. If one of our people is off sick or on holiday, we replace them and the work simply carries on.
We work to your standard, not to a house style of our own. That sounds obvious, but in practice it is where outsourced drafting most often trips up. A set that is technically correct but sits in the wrong layers, with different line weights, its own block names and a title block that does not match, still costs the drawing office a day of clean-up. That is why we ask for those conventions in advance: the layer structure, the templates used, the naming of files and sheets, the scale conventions and the way you track revisions. If there is a CAD manual, we read it. If there is only an existing set, we derive the conventions from it and present our assumptions to you. We work in our own environment with our own licences, so we are not logged into your infrastructure, and we deliver in a format that opens on your side without conversion.
That can be DWG or DXF, a Revit file, or STEP for work that moves on into a fabrication chain. In practice we handle any common CAD format. We always work with the latest versions and deliver backwards-compatible files where needed. The benefit is that an incoming file is usable straight away. Your project lead does not need to check whether the layers are right, and whoever picks up the set six months later recognises the structure immediately. That way the work of a hired drafter stays invisible in the best sense of the word, because it fits seamlessly into the existing set.
Our work goes through at least three review layers before you see anything. A drafter produces the work. A second team member then checks it, with fresh eyes and without the maker's assumptions. After that, Sam, the team leader, looks at it. He has more than fifteen years of background in architecture, worked in Iran for seven years, ran his own design practice in the Netherlands and still works as an engineer.
He focuses mainly on the consistency between sheets, on the things that only stand out when you oversee the entire set. Finally, Barry goes over it, with the eye of someone who has known the project since the first enquiry.
That keeps the number of errors to a minimum in practice. What those layers prevent is familiar stuff: dimensions that do not follow after a change, a detail that differs slightly between two sheets, a layer that has been switched off by accident, an old revision that lingers because nobody closed the previous version. Small things individually, which become big on site or in work preparation.
Combined, the core of our team has around twenty-five years of experience, and that experience lies mainly in spotting deviations like these. We keep the review in place even under time pressure. When a deadline could not slip, we worked evenings and weekends with days of fourteen to fifteen hours, but the second and third checks simply stayed in the process. Speed without review only produces rework.
Send us your documents and drawing conventions and we will let you know within one to two working days what we can take on and when.